Timisoara Medical Journal

(ISSN: 1583-526X) Open Access Journal
Rss Feed:
Timisoara Med 2022, 2022(2), 5; doi: 10.35995/tmj20220205

The Comparative Analysis of Landsberg and Friedman and Stammberger and Hawke Computer Tomography Classifications in the Superior Attachment of the Nasal Uncinate Process (SAUP) and Potential Pitfalls in Evaluation

1 Faculty of Medicine, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Muğla, Turkey
2 Training and Research Hospital, 48000 Muğla, Turkey;
* Correspondence: ; Tel.: +90-5066619794
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 Feb 2022 / Accepted: 3 Jun 2022 / Published: 30 Sep 2022
View Full-text Download PDF (2404kb)

Abstract

(1) Object: Our study aims to identify the common and diverging points in the superior attachment of the nasal uncinate process (SAUP) classifications and to draw attention to the pitfalls in these evaluation processes. (2) Material and Methods: This study was performed on 200 patients (males/females, 100/100; mean age/range: 37.13 ± 16.14/16–84), and 400 sides were bilaterally evaluated. Potential pitfalls were investigated. All UPs were classified according to the Landsberg and Friedman (LF) and Stammberger and Hawke (SH) classifications, and these two classifications were compared. (3) Results: There was a high statistically significant correlation between SH and LF. SH Type IV and LF Type 0 and SH Type III and LF Type 6 completely overlapped. SH Type I corresponded to LF Types 2 and 3 and SH Type II to LF Type 2, 3, 4, and 5 groups. There was no significant difference between genders or sides (right and left) in terms of the LF or SH classifications. (4): Conclusions: Following the thick band and paying attention to concavity and convexity helps to accurately evaluate the anatomical structure. Only two groups overlapped one to one. For SH Types II and III, and LF Types 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, knowing the SAUP group in one classification does not give an exact idea about the group of the other classification. Therefore, it is not possible to make comparisons between reports or studies using different classifications.
Keywords: paranasal sinus; uncinate process; maxillofacial; computed tomography
OPEN ACCESS
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
CITE
Doğan, E.; Elibol, C. The Comparative Analysis of Landsberg and Friedman and Stammberger and Hawke Computer Tomography Classifications in the Superior Attachment of the Nasal Uncinate Process (SAUP) and Potential Pitfalls in Evaluation. Timisoara_Med 2022, 2022, 5.
Doğan E, Elibol C. The Comparative Analysis of Landsberg and Friedman and Stammberger and Hawke Computer Tomography Classifications in the Superior Attachment of the Nasal Uncinate Process (SAUP) and Potential Pitfalls in Evaluation. Timisoara Medical Journal. 2022; 2022(2):5.
Doğan, Emrah; Elibol, Cenk. 2022. "The Comparative Analysis of Landsberg and Friedman and Stammberger and Hawke Computer Tomography Classifications in the Superior Attachment of the Nasal Uncinate Process (SAUP) and Potential Pitfalls in Evaluation." Timisoara_Med 2022, no. 2: 5.
Not implemented
SHARE